Courts & Cases
Is a Gambling Debt Collectable in Court? A State-by-State Map
Nevada’s bad-check statute, NRS 205.130, treats a defaulted casino marker as criminal fraud, not a civil inconvenience.
Updated · United States · English
Filed · Last reviewed
What courts and tribunals have actually decided about gambling disputes — with the docket number, the instance and the date behind every line.
We revise a page when the statute, filing or report behind it changes: if the source is not in front of us, the figure does not go up.
Courts & Cases
Nevada’s bad-check statute, NRS 205.130, treats a defaulted casino marker as criminal fraud, not a civil inconvenience.
NRS 458A.230
Courts & Cases
The first courtroom built specifically for gambling-driven crime opened in Amherst, New York, in 2001.
SELF-EXCLUSION LIST
Courts & Cases
California’s self-exclusion program says it plainly: an active self-excluded patron who walks onto the floor must be removed, the Bureau notified, and any unredeemed jackpots or prizes confiscated.
MALFUNCTION VOIDS ALL PAYS
Courts & Cases
In McKee v. Isle of Capri Casinos, Inc., a penny slot displayed a bonus award of $41,797,550.16. The Iowa Supreme Court held that the patron was entitled to just $1.85, because the game’s approved rules—not the flashing screen—formed the contract between the player and the casino.
Courts & Cases
Gamblers and casinos don’t always agree on the outcome of games. These disagreements have led to some high-profile court cases, where players have sued casinos to collect winnings or vice versa.
This page is written and kept up to date by the desk. Before anything goes up we check three things: that every figure carries the filing, statute or report that fixes it; that every date carries the document it comes from; and that every procedure is described the way the body that runs it describes it. We do not rate operators, we are not paid to list anyone, and where we have no source the field stays empty and we say so.